Search Results for "land use regulation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "land use regulation"

1271 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1271 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction of Disputed Development Control Regulations in PIL Challenging Unauthorized Insertion by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. Unauthorized Insertion of Regulations 16.4.12 and 16.4.13 Without General Body Approval Violates Section 37 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Vitiates State Government's Approval.

9 Sep 2014

The case originated from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur challenging the legality of the insertion of two regulatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds BDA's Power to Allot Civic Amenity Site on Lease and Demand Lease Rentals Under Regulation 7.1(2) of Revised Master Plan 2015. Regulation 7.1(2) is not ultra vires the BDA Act or the Allotment Rules, 1989.

29 Jun 2015

The petitioners, Annabel Builders Developers Private Limited and Westend Heights Condominium Apartment Owners Welfare Association, filed writ petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

21 Nov 2006

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Land Designation for Timber Industry Under Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners, Landowners, Served Purchase Notices and Contended That No Acquisition Steps Were Taken Within Six Months, While Pune Municipal Corporation Asserted Proposal Was Submitted Before Notices.

29 Apr 2005

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Applicability of Repeal Act, 1999. Petition Seeks Quashing of Settlement, Notification, and Possession Orders Based on Erroneous Computation of Excess Land and Abatement of Proceedings.

13 Feb 2019

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urba...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)