Search Results for "input tax credit reversal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "input tax credit reversal"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Order Denying Tax Appropriation and Rectification of Returns. Court Quashes Impugned Order as Without Jurisdiction and Permits Rectification of GST Returns Since Tax Paid Exceeded Proposed Input Tax Credit Reversal with No Revenue Loss Under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

8 Jan 2026

The dispute involved writ petitions challenging GST authorities' orders denying appropriation of tax paid and refusing rectification of returns. The p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules Valid Despite Absence of Specific Enabling Provision in Parent Act at Time of Introduction. Input Tax Credit is a Facility, Not a Vested Right; State Can Restrict ITC on Stock-in-Trade to Reduced Tax Rate.

4 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Punjab against a High Court judgment that had struck down Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Audit Notice Under Section 65 of MGST Act for Cancelled Registrant — Audit Cannot Be Conducted After Registration Cancellation. The court held that Section 65 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 applies only to a registered person, and since the petitioner's registration was cancelled before the audit notice, the notice was without jurisdiction.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Victoria Properties Private Limited, was engaged in rental and leasing services of commercial properties. It was issued a GST registra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

24 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

12 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. The Assessing Officer's reversal of input tax credit under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, was set aside due to lack of proper consideration by the Appellate Tribunal.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Mukand Limited, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, engaged in the manufacture and sale of steel produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)