Summary of Judgement
Acts and Sections Discussed:
- Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (SGST Act)
- Section 2(13) - Definition of "audit."
- Section 2(94) - Definition of "registered person."
- Section 29(3) - Liability post-cancellation of registration.
- Section 65 - Audit by tax authorities.
- Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (GST Rules)
- Rule 101 - Provisions governing audit.
Para-Wise Analysis with Headings
1. Introduction to the Petition
- [Para 1-2]
- The petitioner challenged notices issued under Section 65 of the SGST Act for an audit for the FY 2020-21.
- Primary contention: Audit provisions are inapplicable post-registration cancellation.
2. Factual Background
- [Para 3-6]
- Registration issued on 2 March 2019 and canceled on 2 May 2023 upon closure of business.
- Audit initiated for FY 2020-21.
- Petitioner relied on Tvl. Raja Stores v. AC (ST) (Madras High Court) to argue against post-cancellation audits.
3. Issues for Consideration
- [Para 7-9]
- Key Issue: Whether Section 65 audits apply to persons whose registration has been canceled.
4. Analysis of Relevant Provisions
- [Para 10-15]
- Defined "registered person" under Section 2(94) to include past registrants.
- An audit examines historical records, not concurrent compliance, making it relevant even post-deregistration.
5. Legislative Intent of Section 65
- [Para 16-19]
- Rule 101 emphasizes audit applicability to financial years where registration was active.
- Section 65 audits are preparatory steps for recovery under Sections 73/74.
6. Submissions and Court’s Observations
- [Para 20-23]
- Petitioner’s reliance on Tvl. Raja Stores was found misplaced.
- The Court held that liability persists under Section 29(3), even post-cancellation.
7. Conclusion and Decision
- [Para 24-31]
- Section 65 audits remain applicable for periods when registration was active.
- Petition dismissed, affirming the validity of the audit notice and preliminary findings.
Ratio Decidendi
- Definition of "Registered Person": Includes individuals registered during the period under audit, regardless of subsequent deregistration.
- Continuing Obligations: Cancellation of registration does not absolve compliance for earlier periods under Section 29(3).
- Purpose of Audit: Section 65 enables verification of historical compliance, even post-deregistration.
Subjects:
GST Compliance and Audits
SGST Act, GST Audit, Registration Cancellation, Compliance Obligations, Tax Liability, Rule 101.
Case Title: LJ- Victoria Properties Private Limited Versus Union of India & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LawText (BOM) (11) 190
Case Number: WRIT PETITION (L) NO.34267 OF 2024
Date of Decision: 2024-11-19