Search Results for "imminent threat"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "imminent threat"

145 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Relocation of BARC Nuclear Reactor Due to Tsunami and Fault Line Concerns. Court Holds No Credible Scientific Evidence of Imminent Danger to Nuclear Installation from Geological Fault Line or Tsunami.

28 Apr 2005

The Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Citizens For A Just Society, a social organization founded by Dr. Usha Meh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay and Lack of Public Order Element. Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

24 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Umesh Shivaji Vetal, challenged an order of detention dated 09.06.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahilyanagar, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Witness Statements Insufficient to Justify Detention as 'Dangerous Person' Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

6 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dashrath Madhukar Kasabe, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3 May 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Thane Municipal Corporation's Civil Application for Orders to Vacate Dangerous Building Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Court Notes Visible Cracks and Corroded Beams Make the Building Unsafe.

1 Jul 2019

The matter arose from a civil application filed by the Thane Municipal Corporation seeking directions to the occupants of a building known as Khandu N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

3 Oct 2012

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Lack of Public Order Impact — Mere Law and Order Issues Insufficient for Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be based on material showing a threat to public order, not merely law and order, and that eight past criminal cases and a chapter case did not establish such a threat.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Prashik @ Parshya Dilip Odhane, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded, under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

14 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wildlife Sanctuary and Public Safety Threats. Court Issues Directions to States for Compliance with Environmental Laws and Addresses Fatal Attacks on Forest Guards and Risks to Infrastructure Due to State Apathy and Institutional Failure.

17 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu proceedings on March 13, 2026, in response to reports of rampant illegal sand mining within the National...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Future Retail Limited to Seek Continuation of NCLT Proceedings in Arbitration Dispute - Interim Relief Granted Pending High Court Reconsideration. The Court directed the Delhi High Court to consider FRL's application for continuing proceedings under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for sanction of a Scheme of Arrangement, balancing interests against arbitration enforcement.

15 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a sale transaction between Future Retail Limited and the Reliance Group, which Amazon challenged through arbitration before the...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)