Search Results for "hymen tear"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 of POCSO Act Confirmed as Prosecution Proved Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandip s/o Atmaram Khandekar, was convicted by the Special Court at Warora for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Where Accused Alleged False Implication and Consent. The Court Examined Whether Absence of Bodily Injuries Was Fatal to Prosecution Case Given Corroborating Medical Evidence of Fresh Hymen Tear and Semen Stains.

The present appeal arose from the judgment dated 28th January 2003 of the IInd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 58 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Story. Conviction Under Section 376(g) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape and Victim's Testimony is Full of Omissions.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 376(g) IPC. The appellants, Parmeshwar and Vitthal, were convicted by the trial court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible penetration.

The appellant, Vijay Prahlad Warankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 24 July 1998 for offences under Sections 342 (wrong...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act and IPC — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Child Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Report of Tear in Hymen Establish Offence Under Section 376(1) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Nana @ Dnyneshwar Yerme, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and IPC for kidnapping and raping a four-year-old girl....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistencies in Prosecutrix's Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimonies Failed to Support Allegations of Sexual Assault.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Digambar Telang, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor — Medical and Ocular Evidence Corroborated. Accused convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 4-year-old girl, sentenced to 10 years RI.

The appellant, Bandu @ Bandya Birasing Rajput, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 168 of 1986 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Rape of Minor Daughter Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prabhakar Tulshiram Kambale, was convicted by the Sessions Court for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 928 of 2000 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Assistant Teacher Under Sections 376, 354, and 366 IPC. Appeal Challenges Trial Court's Findings on Alleged Rape and Outraging Modesty of a Minor Student.

The appellant, a mathematics teacher at Yashoyash School, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 366 read with 34, 376, and 354 of the Indian...