Search Results for "heritage precinct"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition Order Set Aside as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Despite Alleged Unauthorized Construction in Heritage Precinct.

The petitioners, Raul Aires Fernandes and John Aires Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 30 March 2016 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.

The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Height Restriction on Multi-Storied Parking Lots Under DCR 33(24). State Government's Power to Modify Development Control Regulations Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966 Upheld — No Vested Right in Unamended Regulation.

The petitioners, claiming ownership of a plot in Tardeo, Mumbai, challenged a decision of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai contained in a l...