Search Results for "halt contractor"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Regularisation of Daily Wage Employees. Held that daily wage employees who completed 240 days of continuous service are entitled to regularisation under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Navi Mumbai Mahanagar Palika and others challenging the judgment of the Industrial Court, Maharashtra, Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Directing Preference to Heir of Deceased Halt Contractor. Contract Expired in 2010, No Right to Preference Under Circular 17.05.1999.

The dispute arose from the appointment of a halt contractor at Pirtala Halt Station. The respondent's father was appointed as a halt contractor, but t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award, Reduces Future Interest from 18% to 9%. Court upheld the arbitrator's findings on quantum but modified the future interest rate as excessive under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), a Central Government Corporation, challenged an arbitral award dated 3 July 2006 passed by a so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prafulkumar Bharmardas Das, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, under Section 302 read with 34 of the India...