Search Results for "gupti"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 5, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara on 17/5/2010 in Sessions Case No. 38 of 2009 under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 30 Arms Act set aside as medical and ballistic evidence contradicted the eyewitness account.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.53...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Five Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and evidence suffered from material contradictions and improvements.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by five accused persons convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was the wife of co-accused and her testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Dinesh Shankar Aakode, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Krishna and sentenced to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support the Alleged Use of Gupti and Witness Testimony Lacked Credibility.

The appellant, Laxman Bapurao Ghaiwane, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 147 and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused of Murder, Convicts for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder and Hurt by Dangerous Weapons — Single blow on head during land dispute not intended to cause death, conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Shrawan Dagdu Pawar, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Ravindra alias Bhausaheb Shridhar Dhumal under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji @Shiva Shrimant Sonawane, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 440 of 2001 ...