Search Results for "gram sabha"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "gram sabha"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch for Gross Negligence and Misconduct Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Appellate Authority's Restoration Order Set Aside. The court held that failure to convene Gram Sabha meetings and misappropriation of funds constituted gross negligence and misconduct under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, and the appellate order was perverse.

10 Feb 2022

The case pertains to the removal of Respondent No.4, Radhakisan Laxman Mhetre, as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Nalwandi, Beed, under Section 39 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.

12 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councilor for Office of Profit — Secretary of Watershed Committee Not an Office of Profit Under Section 16(1)(h) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that the position of Secretary of a Watershed Management Committee with an honorarium of Rs.3,000 per month does not constitute an office of profit under the Act.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Bhagwat Digambarrao Uphad, was elected as a Councilor of the Zilla Parishad. Respondent No.6, Vikram Hanumantrao Uphad, filed an appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch and Members in Gram Panchayat Dispute — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Removal Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Charges and Inquiry Was Conducted Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Apr 2019

The petitioners, who were the elected Sarpanch, Upsarpanch and members of Gram Panchayat Kolhigolhar, were removed from office by an order dated 22-03...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

14 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

17 Oct 2012

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Secretary's Order Restricting Construction on Triangular Property for Traffic Safety Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act. The Court held that the Secretary's order under Section 178(2) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, prohibiting construction on a triangular plot to ensure road safety and visibility, was valid and not arbitrary.

20 Jul 2010

The case involves two writ petitions challenging an order dated 24/03/2003 passed by the Secretary to the Government of Goa (Panchayats) under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

15 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)