Search Results for "gold necklace"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sadaiyandi, was convicted by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Theni, for the murder of a woman and theft of her gold o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Robbery Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Victim and Witnesses Found Unreliable, Medical and Forensic Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Appellant in Murder and Robbery Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Stolen Property and Weapon from Accused, Coupled with Conspiracy Evidence, Completed Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Sonu @ Sunil, along with four others, was tried for the murder of Bharosilal and robbery of gold and silver jewellery and two mobile ph...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vishwas Nathu Sase, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, in Sessions Case No.42 of 2008 for the murder of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Recovery of Dead Body and Articles Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhagwan alias Bapu Narhari Bondre, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences punishable under Sections 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Wife in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Theft. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing husband's nephew by poisoning sustained as chain of circumstances complete.

The appellant, Suvarna Jyotiram Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli for the murder of her husband's nephew, Pratik (aged 3 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Domestic Help in Double Murder and Robbery Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen Theory, and Recovery of Stolen Articles Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 392 IPC.

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction. The accused, Sandeep Sonu Maingade, was employed as a domesti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...