Search Results for "fruit products"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "fruit products"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

25 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Canned Pineapple Slices and Fruit Cocktail Preserved in Sugar Syrup Are Not Fresh Fruits Under Entry A-23 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Goods subjected to processing and preservation lose their character as fresh fruits and are taxable under the residuary entry.

4 Dec 2025

The case concerns a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegetable Fat Spread Held to Fall Under Entry 31 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, 2003 as Edible Oil. Product 'Vegetable Fat Spread' is not an unscheduled commodity but is covered by Entry 31 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

23 Nov 2016

The appellant, M/s. 3F Industries Ltd., manufactures and markets a product called 'vegetable fat spread'. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes issued ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Nutritional Supplements Classified as Food Preparations at 5% Tax. The Court upheld the Tribunal's classification under Schedule Entry C-107(11)(g) of the MVAT Act, 2002, rejecting the Commissioner's attempt to reclassify the products as medicaments.

6 May 2016

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in KVAT Act Classification Case — Mango Juc-Fit and Other Products Held to Be Fruit Products Under Entry 16 of Third Schedule. The Court ruled that the products are covered by the specific entry for fruit products and not unscheduled goods, reversing the Commissioner's revisional order.

27 Apr 2016

The appellant, M/s. Rasna Private Limited, a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act), sought a clarification from the Advance ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Importer of Alcoholic Beverages Against Refusal of NOC by FSSAI for Wine Containing Tartaric Acid and Ascorbic Acid. The court held that these additives are permitted under the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011, and directed release of the consignments.

28 Jul 2015

The Petitioner, M/s Pernod Ricard India P. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing, selling, and importing alcoholic beverages including the wine bra...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not Exigible to Tax Under Entry 82 of Schedule IV of KVAT Act, 2003. The court held that the product, being a mixture of dehydrated potato flakes and vegetables, does not fall under the specific taxing entry and is not exigible to tax.

20 Mar 2015

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.40521/2010 dated 10.02.2011. The respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Pan Masala Manufacturers in Challenge to Maharashtra Gutka Ban — Petitioners Allowed to Continue Manufacturing Outside State Pending Final Hearing. Court Found Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favour of Petitioners Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

15 Sep 2012

The petitioners, companies engaged in the manufacture, supply, and distribution of pan masala containing tobacco (gutka) and pan masala not containing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act includes substances for chewing, and that the ban on food products containing tobacco or nicotine is valid and not ultra vires.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, manufacturers and sellers of gutka and pan masala containing tobacco or nicotine, challenged the validity of the ban imposed by the C...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)