Search Results for "franchisee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "franchisee"

51 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Franchise Dispute: Breach of Contract Not Cheating Without Fraudulent Intent. Essential Ingredients of Sections 420 and 406 IPC Not Made Out as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

29 Nov 2024

The applicants, directors of AN Retail Ventures Private Limited (ANR), sought quashing of FIR No.134/2021 registered at Osmanpura Police Station, Aura...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Franchise Dispute Due to Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims. Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Section 11(6) applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the court may refuse reference where claims are hopelessly barred by limitation.

1 Mar 2024

The petitioner, M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., a company based in Afghanistan, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited in Doctrine of Mutuality Case — Surplus from AMP Activities Held Taxable as Income. Contributions from Non-Beneficiaries and Lack of Complete Identity Between Contributors and Beneficiaries Defeats Claim of Mutuality Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between Yum! Restaurants (Marketing) Private Limited (YRMPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yum! Restaurants (India) Pv...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 9 Application. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arises Partly in Goa Where Agreements Were to Be Performed, Conferring Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

4 May 2016

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions (a partnership firm) and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9. Court Holds That Part of Cause of Action Arising in Goa Confers Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

4 May 2016

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Franchisee in EuroKids Trademark Dispute — Franchise Agreement Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Royalty and Breach of Terms. Court Restrains Respondent from Using Petitioner's Trademarks and Operating as Franchisee Pending Arbitration.

1 Jul 2015

The petitioner, EuroKids International Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Franchisee's Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Franchise Dispute. Court holds that arbitration clause providing for three arbitrators with franchisor appointing one arbitrator is valid and not unconscionable, and that Section 9 petition is not maintainable as the arbitration agreement provides for a specific mechanism for appointment of arbitrators.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Karan Sahgal, a franchisee, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Co-defendant in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Deletion of Party Ordered Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Co-defendant Against Whom No Relief Claimed is Not a Necessary Party.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a suit filed by Vidharbha Enterprises (plaintiff) against the Union of India and BSNL (...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)