Search Results for "food adulteration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "food adulteration"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Pan Masala Manufacturers in Challenge to Maharashtra Gutka Ban — Petitioners Allowed to Continue Manufacturing Outside State Pending Final Hearing. Court Found Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favour of Petitioners Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

15 Sep 2012

The petitioners, companies engaged in the manufacture, supply, and distribution of pan masala containing tobacco (gutka) and pan masala not containing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

4 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Importer of Alcoholic Beverages Against Refusal of NOC by FSSAI for Wine Containing Tartaric Acid and Ascorbic Acid. The court held that these additives are permitted under the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011, and directed release of the consignments.

28 Jul 2015

The Petitioner, M/s Pernod Ricard India P. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing, selling, and importing alcoholic beverages including the wine bra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act includes substances for chewing, and that the ban on food products containing tobacco or nicotine is valid and not ultra vires.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, manufacturers and sellers of gutka and pan masala containing tobacco or nicotine, challenged the validity of the ban imposed by the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

6 Mar 2018

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case, Upholding Prosecution Under Indian Penal Code Alongside Food Safety Act. The Court Held That the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Does Not Override Sections 272 and 273 IPC, as IPC Is Not a Food-Related Law Under Section 89, and Prosecution Under Both Enactments Is Permissible Without Double Punishment.

21 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the interplay between the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and Sections 272 and 273 of the In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Denies Probation to Adult Offenders. Section 20AA of PoFA Act, which excludes application of Probation of Offenders Act and Section 360 CrPC for offenders above 18, is constitutional and does not violate Articles 14, 21, or 20(1) of the Constitution.

15 Jul 2025

The Supreme Court dismissed two criminal appeals arising from convictions under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PoFA Act). In the lead ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Seller and Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Failure to Send Sample to Director of Central Food Laboratory Renders Public Analyst Report Inadmissible.

8 Apr 2011

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Maharashtra Government through the Food Inspector against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 14.3.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Judgment Upholding Tender Conditions for ICDS Nutrition Supply — Tender Conditions Ousting Local Women's Groups Held Arbitrary and Contrary to PUCL Directions. The Court Reiterated That Contracts for Supplementary Nutrition Must Be Given to Genuine Mahila Mandals and Self-Help Groups, Not to Large Corporates, Under the Integrated Child Development Scheme and National Food Security Act, 2013.

26 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals and a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 11.7.2016 of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)