KAHC010403282026_2
23 Jul 2026The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...
Search Results for "favouritism"
226 result(s) found
Found 226 result(s)
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Appointment Order in Favouritism Case — Merit List Manipulation in Administrator-cum-Cook Recruitment. Court sets aside appointment of lower-merit candidate and directs fresh appointment based on merit list under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
16 Feb 2026The petitioner, Sangada Hansaben Malabhai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.04.2018...
- 104
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.
9 Jul 2024The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...
- 1004
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Forest Constable Recruitment Case — Cancellation of Select List Upheld Due to Serious Irregularities. Selection Process Conducted Without Written Examination and Violated Reservation Policy, Justifying Fresh Recruitment.
1 May 2023The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Assam and its officers against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court, which had quashed th...
- 1485
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.
31 Jan 2022The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...
- 547
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority Order Under Contract Labour Act — Union Lacks Locus Standi as Individual Workers Not Parties. Petitioner Union failed to establish that it was a recognized union or that the individual workers were parties to the appeal, and the Appellate Authority's order was not shown to be perverse or illegal.
9 Aug 2016The petitioners, comprising two individual workers (Ambadas Dattatraya Rahinj and Balasaheb Ashok Londhe) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Kamgar Sanghat...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Holding Unrecognised Union Cannot Maintain Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court ruled that only a recognised union has locus standi to file a complaint under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 for items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.
18 Dec 2015The case involves an appeal by Ballarpur Industries Limited (appellant) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land to Sugar Factory in Public Interest Litigation — Grazing Land Cannot Be Diverted for Industrial Use Without Following Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
8 May 2015The Bombay High Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and a connected Writ Petition concerning the allotment of gairan (grazing) land t...
- 82
Supreme Court
Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.
12 Apr 2012Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Veterinary Officers for Unauthorized Absence and Misconduct. Termination simpliciter under probation rules is valid and not punitive, and the petitioners were given adequate opportunity to explain their absence.
30 Nov -0001The case involves four writ petitions filed by 17 petitioners who were appointed as Veterinary Officers on probation by the Government of Goa. They we...
- 122
