Search Results for "erroneous and prejudicial"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Act Case Upholding Revisional Jurisdiction. Commissioner Validly Set Aside Assessment Order as Payment to Shareholders Was Not 'Cost of Improvement' Under Capital Gains Computation Under Sections 48 and 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment concerning the sale of a property named 'Paville House' by the respondent assessee, a company engaged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in LIC Housing Finance Ltd. Tax Case — Tribunal's Order Quashing Revision Under Section 263 Upheld. Two Views Possible on Applicability of Section 36(1)(viii) Read with Section 41(4A) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed four appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...