Search Results for "electricity ombudsman"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Writ Petition Against Insurance Ombudsman Award in Life Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Ailments Not Proven to be Material Under Section 45 of Insurance Act, 1938.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged an award dated 31 December 2020 passed by the Insurance Ombudsman, Goa/Mumbai Met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Restore Consumer's Electricity Supply. The Court upheld the Ombudsman's jurisdiction to entertain billing disputes and direct reconnection without precondition of payment of disputed dues.

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from the same order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated 17.10.2018. The first petition was filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Against Ombudsman Orders for New Electricity Connections. Court holds that refusal to provide new connections based on previous dues of a different entity is arbitrary and violative of Section 43 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders of the Ele...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Provide New Connection Without Recovery of Previous Dues. Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Electricity Arrears Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman, Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Electricity Bill Disconnection for Non-Payment. Held that the Electricity Ombudsman's order directing payment of arrears before reconnection was valid and within jurisdiction under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Mr. Awadesh S. Pandey, a proprietor of Sunshine Plastic Industries, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombu...