Search Results for "electricity bill dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "electricity bill dispute"

254 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CGRF Order in Electricity Bill Dispute — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Correct Application of Multiplying Factor. Court holds that CGRF erred in treating the mistake as non-bonafide and in estimating consumption without proper evidence, directing reconsideration in light of Supreme Court precedent.

21 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 15.11.2022 passed by the Consumer Griev...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Safety Regulation and Government Exemption Order Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court addressed whether Regulation 116 is ultra vires, if transfer schemes protect unqualified employees, and the arbitrariness of a Government Order granting exemptions from safety qualifications.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed in the High Court of Kerala challenging Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measure...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee's Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute — Holds Additional Demand Time-Barred for Disconnection Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. The two-year limitation for disconnection runs from the date of the original bill, not from discovery of a billing mistake.

18 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute between the Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (appellant/licensee) and Rahamatullah Khan alias Ra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Billing Dispute — Petitioner Agro Industry Challenged Retrospective Reclassification and Demand for Arrears Under HT-2(A) Tariff. Court Held That Reclassification Without Prior Notice and Retrospective Application of Tariff Was Unlawful and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

7 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Sri Balaji Agro Industries, is an agro-based industry located at Chicksugur Industrial Growth Center, Raichur. The respondent, GES...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

24 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)