Search Results for "earth filling work"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "earth filling work"

23 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Earth Without Permission in Construction Project. Excavation for Foundation Laying and Backfilling Does Not Amount to 'Illegal Excavation' Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, M/s BGR Energy Systems Limited, was awarded a contract by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited (MAHAGENCO) for construct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Summary Suit for Recovery of Contractual Payment in Earth Filling Work Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff proved contract and performance, and defendant failed to prove defence of poor quality or inflated claims.

9 Mar 2016

The plaintiff, Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai, carrying on business as a proprietress in civil construction works under the name M/s. Sterling Engineering Co.,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Demand for Royalty on Earth Excavated for Plot Development — Notification Exempting Royalty on Earth Used for Same Plot Development Applies Retrospectively. The court held that the exemption notification dated 5 May 2015 under the Maharashtra Minor Minerals Extraction (Development and Regulation Rules) 2013 applies retrospectively, and the order demanding royalty without hearing violates natural justice.

16 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Agile Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate development company, owned lands at revenue village Balkum in Thane district, includi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Government's Appeal in Road Construction Contract Dispute, Upholding Contractor's Payment Claim Based on Final Joint Survey Report. Payment Obligation Arises Under Contractual Terms as per General Conditions of Contract, Clause 2.8.1, with High Court's Order for Payment of Rs. 31,57,16,134/- with Interest Affirmed.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a road construction contract under the Special Accelerated Rural Development Programme (SARDP) for improvement of road from Lum...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation from Rs.1,40,000 to Rs.1,00,000 with 6% Interest. Court holds that market value of acquired land must be determined based on comparable sale instances and potential for development, not on speculative future use.

11 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat and others filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.

6 May 2011

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction on Khajuria Lake and Restoration of Water Body. Municipal Corporation and State Directed to Recover Costs from Erring Officers and Initiate Prosecution for Unauthorized Filling of 100-Year-Old Lake.

3 Aug 2018

The petitioner, an Indian citizen and resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to demolish illegal construction on CT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Levy of Excise Duty on Fabrication and Construction of Structurals - Activities Do Not Amount to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Fabrication at site results in immovable property, not excisable goods.

29 Apr 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. and Ceat Tyres of India ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)