Search Results for "earnest money forfeiture"

138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Contract for Sale of Aero-Scrap. Clause Explicitly Stipulating Deposit as Earnest Money and Forfeiture on Default Valid Under Sections 64 and 74 of Contract Act, 1872.

The dispute arose from a contract for sale of aero-scrap between the appellants, Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills, and the respondent, Tata Air-Craft Ltd. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Earnest Money in Tender Withdrawal Case — Forfeiture Order Set Aside. Petitioner's withdrawal of offer before tender opening due to delay held valid, and forfeiture of earnest money without contractual basis was illegal.

The petitioner, Vinod J. Agarwal, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the order of forfeiture of earnest money passed by the Mira-Bhayand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of EMD in Tender Dispute - Petitioner Entitled to Full Refund of Earnest Money Deposit as Forfeiture Without Specific Clause is Unjust Enrichment. The Court directed refund of balance 10% EMD of Rs.12 lakhs as retention without contractual basis is impermissible.

The Petitioner, M/s. API Civilcon Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Bank Guarantees in Tender Dispute. Earnest Money Deposit Forfeited as Bidder's Unilateral Discount Offer After Bid Opening Violated Tender Terms.

The petitioner, Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in coal trading, along with its shareholder, filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Earnest Money by KSFC in E-Auction Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner Claims Suppression of Pending Suit and Interim Order Affected Marketable Title, Rendering Auction Notification Fraudulent.

The petitioner, N. Lakshmana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Flat Purchase Dispute — Earnest Money Refund with Daily Fine and Compound Interest Upheld but Reduced. Clause 4 of Agreement for Construction and Sale Held to Be a Valid Forfeiture Clause, Not a Penalty, Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Dr. Jagdish J.N. Counte, entered into a written agreement dated 13.4.96 with the defendant, M/s. Carl Estate Private Limited, for the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Refund of Forfeited Auction Amount in SARFAESI Sale Due to Bank's Failure to Issue Sale Certificate. Bank's Failure to Perform Reciprocal Promise Discharges Bidder from Obligation to Pay Balance.

The petitioner, Sri Kalyanamurthy K., participated in an e-auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent) for the sale of an immovable prop...