High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in KVAT Penalty Case — Minor Discrepancy Between e-Sugam and Invoice Not Sufficient for Penalty. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside penalty under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, accepting the assessee's explanation that the discrepancy was due to pre-final invoice feeding.
14 Jun 2018The State of Karnataka filed a revision petition under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against the order of the Ka...
