Search Results for "duty of care"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cheque Clearing Deficiency. Bank held liable for deficiency in service under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 due to negligence in presenting cheques within validity period, with compensation awarded for loss caused by expired cheques.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals filed by Canara Bank against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Profession and Consumer Protection Laws: Navigating the Boundaries Exploring the Applicability of Consumer Protection Laws to Advocates and Legal Services

The case concerns the applicability of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (CP Act), as re-enacted in 2019, to complaints alleging "deficiency in servic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Finding of Deficiency of Service in Hotel Swimming Pool Death — Duty of Care Owed by Hotel Management to Guests Using Pool Facilities. Assigning Lifeguard Additional Bartending Duties Constitutes Breach of Duty Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 28 April 2015, which held the Kerala Tourism De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order Exonerating Hospital and Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — No Negligence Found in Treatment and Discharge of Cancer Patient. Bolam Test Applied: Doctor Not Negligent If Acting in Accordance with Practice Accepted by a Reasonable Body of Medical Men.

The appellant, Vinod Jain, filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and Dr. R.K. Bhandari a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Medical Negligence Case — No Negligence Found in Treatment and Discharge of Cancer Patient. Doctor's Decision to Administer Oral Antibiotic and Discharge Patient Held to Be Within Accepted Medical Practice Under Bolam Test.

The appellant, Vinod Jain, filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital and Dr. R.K. Jat after ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Monitoring in Dengue Treatment. Failure to Monitor Hematocrit and Platelet Levels Constitutes Negligence Despite Following Fluid Protocol.

The case pertains to a medical negligence claim arising from the death of Madhu Manglik, the spouse of the appellant Arun Kumar Manglik, who was admit...