Search Results for "driver dismissal"

659 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 659 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses GSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Proved. Bus dashed into parked rickshaw from behind, causing death and injuries; Tribunal's finding of negligence upheld.

The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC) filed three first appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Case, Upholds 50:50 Contributory Negligence Apportionment. Both ST Bus and Truck Drivers Found Negligent Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 12.01.2007 when an ST bus (GJ-18-V-8903) driven rashly rammed into a stationary truck (GJ-7-X-6523) parked wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's contributory negligence assessed at 50% for sitting on the footboard of a bus, reducing insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Gulam Mohammad, sustained injuries while traveling as a passenger in a bus owned by Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Bus Driver in Gross Negligence Case. The Industrial Court's finding that the bus driver was not negligent was based on evidence and not perverse, and thus no interference under Article 227 was warranted.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking), challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 16 August 2007,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case — Negligent Driving Resulting in Death and Injuries Justifies Dismissal; Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Quashed as Perverse Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had set asi...