Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Insurer in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that where the deceased was driving a motorcycle without a valid driving license and contributed to the accident, the insurer is liable to pay compensation but is entitled to recover the same from the owner of the vehicle.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This appeal arises from a judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in MACP No. 559 of 2007. The appellant, Smt. Kamal wd/o Daulatrao Deshmukh, was the original respondent No. 1 (owner of the vehicle) in the claim petition filed by the respondents (claimants) for compensation for the death of Dnyandeo Bhujbal in a motor vehicle accident. The deceased was riding a motorcycle owned by the appellant when it collided with a truck. The Tribunal held that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the truck driver, but also found contributory negligence on the part of the deceased as he was driving without a valid license. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 4,50,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum, directing the insurer (respondent No. 4) to pay the amount but granting it the right to recover from the owner. The appellant challenged the award, primarily contending that the insurer should not be liable to pay compensation as the deceased was driving without a license. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the deceased was indeed driving without a valid license and contributed to the accident. However, following the principle of 'pay and recover' under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the Court held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties but can recover the amount from the owner. On quantum, the Court reassessed the compensation: the deceased was 63 years old, earning Rs. 3,000 per month as a watchman, and the multiplier of 9 was appropriate. After deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, the loss of dependency was calculated at Rs. 2,16,000. Adding Rs. 40,000 for loss of consortium, Rs. 15,000 for loss of estate, and Rs. 5,000 for funeral expenses, the total compensation was reduced to Rs. 2,76,000. The Court modified the award accordingly, directing the insurer to pay the reduced amount with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition, with liberty to recover from the owner.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - Deceased driving motorcycle without valid license - Tribunal held insurer liable to pay compensation but granted recovery rights - Held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties but can recover from the owner as per Section 149(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Paras 10-15).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Quantum of Compensation - Deceased aged 63 years, income assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month - Multiplier of 9 applied - Deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses - Loss of dependency calculated at Rs. 2,16,000 - Additional amounts for loss of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses - Total compensation reduced from Rs. 4,50,000 to Rs. 2,76,000 - Held that the Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier was correct but the award was excessive (Paras 16-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding the insurer liable to pay compensation despite the deceased driving without a valid driving license and whether the insurer is entitled to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The impugned award is modified. The compensation is reduced from Rs. 4,50,000 to Rs. 2,76,000. The insurer (respondent No. 4) is directed to pay the compensation amount with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition till realization, and is entitled to recover the same from the appellant (owner) in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Driving Without License
  • Pay and Recover
  • Section 149 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (04) 5

First Appeal No. 1757 of 2018 with Civil Application No. 6662 of 2018

2019-04-16

Sunil K. Kotwal, J.

Mr. S.T. Shelke for appellant, Mr. S.V. Kulkarni for respondent No.4

Smt. Kamal wd/o Daulatrao Deshmukh

Smt. Archana Raju @ Rajaram Bhujbal & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for death in a motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (owner of the vehicle) sought to set aside the award directing the insurer to pay compensation and recover from the owner, or alternatively, to reduce the quantum of compensation.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the Tribunal's award on the ground that the insurer should not be liable to pay compensation as the deceased was driving without a valid license, and also challenged the quantum of compensation as excessive.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs. 4,50,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum, directing the insurer to pay and recover from the owner.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding the insurer liable to pay compensation despite the deceased driving without a valid driving license? Whether the insurer is entitled to recover the compensation amount from the owner of the vehicle? Whether the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deceased was driving without a valid license and thus the insurer should not be liable to pay compensation; the Tribunal erred in directing the insurer to pay and recover. Respondent No. 4 (insurer) supported the appellant's contention that the insurer should not be liable, but alternatively submitted that if liable, the insurer should have recovery rights. Claimants (respondents) argued that the Tribunal correctly applied the 'pay and recover' principle and that the quantum of compensation was just.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, an insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties even if the vehicle was driven without a valid license, but the insurer is entitled to recover the amount from the owner of the vehicle. The quantum of compensation must be assessed based on the income, age, and multiplier as per settled principles.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has rightly held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the claimants, but is entitled to recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. Considering the age of the deceased as 63 years, the multiplier of 9 is applicable. The compensation is reduced to Rs. 2,76,000.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MACP No. 559 of 2007 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The Tribunal passed an award on 31/08/2017. The appellant (original respondent No. 1) filed First Appeal No. 1757 of 2018 before the High Court challenging the award. The High Court heard the appeal and pronounced judgment on 16/04/2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 149, Section 149(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Insurer in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that where the deceased was driving a motorcycle without a valid driving license and contributed to the accid...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Disability Pension to Soldier Discharged for Schizophrenia — Mental Disorder Presumed Attributable to Military Service Under Rule 14 of Entitlement Rules. The Court held that in the absence of a note at enrolment and without re...