Search Results for "different establishments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "different establishments"

674 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 674 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to PF Act Notification for Establishment with Multiple Units. Single establishment determination under Section 2A of EPF Act requires functional integrity test, not mere geographical distance.

24 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Kay Iron Works Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, with its registered office at Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Three Establishments Denied Exemption Under Employees' Provident Funds Act. Functional Integrality and Common Ownership with Parent Company Preclude Claim of New Establishment Status Under Section 16(1)(d).

12 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed three civil appeals filed by M/s. Shree Vishal Printers Ltd., Jaipur (SVPL), M/s. Times Publishing House Ltd., Jaipur (TPH...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

11 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Commissioner of Labour's Order Holding Religious Trust as Commercial Establishment Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Trust's Charitable and Religious Objects Exclude It from Definition of Commercial Establishment Under Section 2(4) of the Act.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Shri Vatavriksha Swami Maharaj Devasthan, Akkalkot, is a religious and charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Restaurant's Challenge to Closing Hours Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Petitioner's Request for Exemption from Section 19(1) Timings Rejected as State Government Lacks Power to Grant Individual Exemptions Beyond Schedule II.

15 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Sardar Refreshments, a restaurant, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the State of Maharashtra to grant it an exemption ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Medical Establishments under Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, 2017. Medical Profession Held to Have Commercial Aspect; Registration Requirement for Nursing Homes with Ten or More Employees is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Clinical Establishments Act.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Dr. Pradeep Arora, a medical practitioner and owner of Arora Hospital in Nagpur, challenged the definition of 'establishment' under Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Remand in Industrial Dispute Over Transfer of Employment. Contract of Service Held Not Transferable Unilaterally; Dismissal by Transferee Establishment Invalid Absent Termination of Original Employment Under C.P. & Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947.

27 Sep 1968

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute where Respondent No. 1, originally employed in the appellant-firm's factory at Kamptee, was later directed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

26 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESI Corporation's Appeal in Clubbing of Establishments Case - Employees of Sister Concerns Not Deemed Employees Under Section 2(9) of ESI Act. The court held that functional integrality alone is insufficient to treat employees of separate firms as employees of the principal establishment.

23 Feb 2005

The Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, filed an appeal against the order of the Employees' State Insurance Court which allowed...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)