Search Results for "deliberate disobedience"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Lack of Willful Disobedience of Interim Order in RSA. Court holds that mere violation of an order without proof of willful and deliberate disobedience does not constitute contempt under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The present contempt petition was filed by the complainants under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the accused-co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance of Land Acquisition Order. Conditional Order Does Not Amount to Willful Disobedience Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Chinchwad Devasthan Trust, a public religious trust, owned land admeasuring about 1,05,400 sq.m at Bhosari within the jurisdictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...