Search Results for "defreezing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "defreezing"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Accounts in Cheque-Bouncing Case — No Prima Facie Case for Freezing Under Section 102 CrPC. Court held that freezing of accounts under Section 102 CrPC is not permissible for investigation of cheque-bouncing offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the offence is non-cognizable and the bank is not a third party.

30 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Manish Khandelwal, Sunil Khandelwal, and B.M. Financial Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Onerous Bail Conditions in Commercial Dispute Case — Directs Defreezing of Bank Account. Court held that imposing condition of depositing Rs.59 crore for bail in a case arising from a commercial transaction is unreasonable and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Vyomesh Shah, Kiran Contractor, and Suhass Dumbre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Co-operative Housing Society Challenging CBI Investigation in Corruption Case — Court Holds That Sanction for Prosecution Is Not Required at Investigation Stage and That CBI Has Jurisdiction to Investigate Without State Consent Under Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Adarsh Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, filed a Crim...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Orders Release of Seized Goods and Defreezing of Bank Accounts Under GST Act After Expiry of One-Year Limitation Period. The court held that provisional attachment under Section 83(2) and seizure under Section 67(7) of the GST Act cannot continue beyond one year, directing the state to release goods and defreeze accounts.

9 Jan 2026

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in trading gold, silver, diamonds, and jewellery, had its premises searched on 09.03.2022 under Section 67(...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Defreezing of Bank Account — Bank Cannot Freeze Account Based on Third Party Letter Without Legal Authority. HDFC Bank directed to defreeze account of former employee based on unsubstantiated allegations of misappropriation by IBM Solutions Private Limited.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Sri Prasanna Kumar Dixit, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the HDF...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Magistrate's Order Reversing Fund Transfer in Cyber Fraud Case — Petitioner's Bank Account Used for Fraudulent Transaction Without Consent. The Court Held That a Magistrate Cannot Direct Reversal of Bank Transfers Under Section 451 CrPC as Such Transfers Are Not Property Subject to Speedy Destruction.

17 Oct 2022

The petitioners, Sri Rahul Chari (Whole-time Director of PhonePe Private Limited) and PhonePe Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeals Against Single Judge Order in Company Dispute Over Bank Account Freezing. The Court held that the writ petition was maintainable but the interim relief of defreezing accounts was not justified as there was a prima facie case of mismanagement and balance of convenience favored maintaining status quo.

13 Jul 2021

The case involves two writ appeals filed by Mr. Manne Guru Prasad and Shri Ramappa against an order dated 06.04.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted by Sessions Court Due to Judicial Impropriety — Co-ordinate Bench Cannot Override Earlier Order of Same Court Without Change in Circumstances. The High Court set aside the bail order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, as it was passed in disregard of an earlier order of a co-ordinate bench of the same court rejecting bail on merits.

23 Feb 2018

The applicant, Gopal Singh, filed a criminal application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking cancellation of bail gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Police Custody Remand Order in Criminal Case — Revisional Court's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 167 CrPC. The court held that the accused must be produced before the court granting police custody remand and that the revisional court exceeded its jurisdiction by substituting its view without finding the Magistrate's order perverse.

11 Sep 2017

The applicant, Parshuram Dongre, was arrested in connection with a criminal case. The investigating officer sought police custody remand (PCR) before ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)