Search Results for "deer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "deer"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Translocation of Deer from Urban Park to Tiger Reserves Based on Scientific Carrying Capacity and CEC Recommendations. The Court directed regulation of deer population at A.N. Jha Deer Park to 38 deer as per CZA norms and approved translocation of surplus deer to Rajasthan tiger reserves with safeguards.

27 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court was hearing special leave petitions concerning the translocation of hundreds of deer from A.N. Jha Deer Park, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

17 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Closure of Byculla Zoo for Failing to Meet Modern Standards of Animal Welfare and Conservation. Zoo's antiquated conditions violate fundamental duty of compassion under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution and provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

18 Jul 2005

The Bombay High Court delivered an oral judgment on July 18, 2005, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Crop Damage by Wild Animals Under Government Resolution — Bluebulls Damage to Orange Plantation Entitles Farmer to Compensation as Per Government Policy. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 02/7/2010 does not restrict compensation to only yielding crops and denial of compensation is arbitrary and discriminatory.

5 May 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Vimal Haribhau Naik, an agriculturist, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for damage to her orange trees caused by bluebu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court&#039;s Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

29 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims, Upholds Compensation Awards. The court held that the insurer failed to prove breach of policy conditions and that the quantum of compensation was just and proper.

19 Jan 2024

The case involves two miscellaneous first appeals filed by the Divisional Manager of The New India Assurance Company Limited under Section 173(1) of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Wildlife Offence Case — Petitioner Allegedly Involved in Killing of Spotted Deer Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Court Held That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted as a Matter of Routine and Must Be Considered on Merits, But Found No Prima Facie Case for Custodial Interrogation.

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Ramesh, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Stone-Crushing Industries' Challenge to Wildlife Sanctuary Notification Due to Procedural Compliance and Environmental Conservation. The Court upheld the notification declaring Kappathagudda Wildlife Sanctuary under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, finding it validly issued after due process and necessary for biodiversity protection, thereby restricting mining in the Eco-Sensitive Zone.

4 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by multiple stone-crushing industries and individuals holding licenses to operate on patta lands near the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies High Powered Committee Recommendations in Chardham Highway Project Case to Balance Development and Environmental Protection. The court held that widening of highways in ecologically sensitive Himalayan region must be subject to strict environmental safeguards and monitoring.

14 Dec 2021

The case concerns the Chardham Mahamarg Vikas Pariyojna, a project by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways to widen approximately 900 km of nat...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)