Search Results for "dealer protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dealer protection"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Vehicle Defect Case — Manufacturer Not Vicariously Liable for Independent Dealer's Service Deficiencies. Concurrent Findings of Lower Fora Set Aside as No Privity of Contract Exists Between Manufacturer and Consumer Under Consumer Protection Act.

18 Jun 2025

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the Managing Director of TATA Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited before the National Consumer Disputes Redre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Commercial Purpose' Under Consumer Protection Act for Company Purchases for Director Use. The Court held that purchase of a vehicle by a company for personal use of its directors does not amount to commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

9 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the interpretation of 'commercial purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Car Delivery Dispute, Restoring Lower Forum Orders. National Commission Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact on Used Car Delivery.

8 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint where the appellant booked and paid the full sale consideration for a new Tata Victa GX TC car from the de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Insurance Claim Due to Expired Temporary Registration. Driving Vehicle Without Valid Registration After Temporary Registration Expiry Constitutes Fundamental Breach of Policy Terms Under Sections 39 and 192 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Entitling Insurer to Repudiate Claim.

30 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from an insurance claim repudiation by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. after the theft of the respondent's Bolero car. The responden...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

20 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

1 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by Shailendra Bhatnagar against Hyundai Motor India Limited regarding non-deployment of airbags in hi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

10 Feb 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.

13 Apr 2023

The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Use of 'KATARIA INSURANCE' Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Marks 'KATARIA' and 'KATARIA INSURANCE CONSULTANCY' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Dec 2025

The plaintiff, Bhavesh Suresh Kataria, proprietor of Kataria Jewellery Insurance Consultancy, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)