Search Results for "credit note"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Respondents Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Due to Lack of Mandatory Enquiry Under Section 202 CrPC -- Misbranding Allegations Fail on Jurisdictional Grounds

The Supreme Court addressed criminal appeals arising from a complaint under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, alleging misbranding of a vaccine by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Appellate Order in GST Case, Remands for Merits Hearing Due to Portal Technicalities and Business Closure. M/s R P Chemicals Wins Remand Against GST Tax Demand of Rs. 8,12,967/-

The petitioner, challenged an appellate order that rejected their appeal against a GST tax demand of Rs. 8,12,967/- on grounds of delay. The tax deman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Excise Duty Refund Case Under Central Excise Act, 1944. Refund Denied as Value of Returned Goods Determined as Scrap Was Less Than Duty Paid Under Section 173L(v), with No Error Found in Valuation or Procedural Fairness.

The dispute arose from a claim for refund of excise duty by an assessee manufacturer of plastic moulded furniture, who had issued credit notes for rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT Order in Insolvency Case Due to Procedural Irregularity in Admitting Additional Evidence. Matter Remanded to NCLT for Reconsideration with Emails as Evidence and Opportunity for Corporate Debtor to Respond Under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The dispute arose from an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by an operational creditor against a corporate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 Due to Lack of Bona Fide Dispute. Concurrent Findings Upheld as Appellant's Defence Was Vague and Non-Specific in Reply to Statutory Notice Under Sections 433(e) and 434.

The dispute arose from a transaction where the respondent, a manufacturer of acrylic yarn, supplied material on credit to the appellant. The appellant...