Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968, not on date of order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira, along with co-owners, applied on 08.03.2013 under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968 to convert the use of a portion of land admeasuring 16014 square metres in Margao. The Deputy Collector issued an acknowledgment on 29.04.2013, and after inspections and reports, the petitioner signed an affidavit cum indemnity bond on 19.07.2013. On 19.09.2013, the Deputy Collector issued a communication directing the petitioner to pay conversion fees in terms of the Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act 2013, which came into force on 01.04.2013, and demanded fees at the enhanced rates. The petitioner challenged this communication, seeking recalculation of fees based on the rates applicable on the date of the application (08.03.2013) and refund of excess fees with interest. The court considered the legal issue of whether the conversion fees should be determined by the rates on the date of application or the date of the order. The court held that the right to conversion accrues on the date of application, and any subsequent amendment cannot affect pending applications unless expressly made retrospective. The impugned communication was quashed, and the respondents were directed to recalculate the fees based on the rates prevailing on 08.03.2013 and refund any excess amount collected with interest at 12% per annum.

Headnote

A) Land Revenue - Conversion Fees - Applicable Rate - Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968 - The petitioner applied for conversion of land use on 08.03.2013. The Deputy Collector issued a communication on 19.09.2013 demanding conversion fees at rates under the Amendment Act 2013 which came into force on 01.04.2013. The court held that the fees must be calculated based on the rates prevailing on the date of the application, as the right to conversion crystallizes on the date of application. The impugned communication was quashed and the respondents were directed to recalculate fees accordingly. (Paras 2-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conversion fees payable under the Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act 2013 should be calculated based on the rates prevailing on the date of the application or the date of the order granting conversion

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned communication dated 19.09.2013 is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to recalculate the conversion fees payable by the petitioner based on the rates prevailing on the date of the application i.e. 08.03.2013 and refund the excess fees recovered with interest at 12% per annum.

Law Points

  • Conversion fees under Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act 2013 must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application
  • not date of order
  • Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968
  • Principle of vested rights on application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016:BHC-GOA:2673-DB

WRIT PETITION NO. 262 OF 2014

2016-10-13

F. M. Reis, Nutan D. Sardessai

2016:BHC-GOA:2673-DB

Mrs. A. Agni, Mr. C. Padgaonkar, Ms. Aditi Kamat, Mr. D. Lawande

Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira

State of Goa, Deputy Collector (Revenue)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging communication demanding conversion fees under amended Act

Remedy Sought

Quash communication dated 19.09.2013, direct recalculation of fees based on rates on date of application, refund excess fees with interest

Filing Reason

Deputy Collector demanded conversion fees at enhanced rates under Amendment Act 2013, whereas petitioner claimed rates on date of application should apply

Issues

Whether conversion fees should be calculated based on rates on date of application or date of order

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the right to conversion crystallized on the date of application and subsequent amendment cannot affect pending applications Respondents argued that the fees are payable as per the rates prevailing at the time of grant of permission

Ratio Decidendi

The right to conversion of land use accrues on the date of application under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968. Any subsequent amendment enhancing fees cannot apply to pending applications unless expressly made retrospective. Therefore, conversion fees must be calculated based on the rates prevailing on the date of the application.

Judgment Excerpts

The above Petition, inter alia, prays for a direction to quash and set aside the communication dated 19.09.2013 of the Deputy Collector directing the petitioner to pay conversation fees in terms of the Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act 2013 Briefly, it is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner along with the other co-owners of the property, had applied for permission under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968 to convert use of part of the land... on 08.03.2013.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for conversion on 08.03.2013. Deputy Collector issued acknowledgment on 29.04.2013. Inspection on 15.05.2013. Reports from Mamlatdar, Town and Country Planning, and Forest Department received. Affidavit cum indemnity bond signed on 19.07.2013. Deputy Collector issued communication on 19.09.2013 demanding fees under Amendment Act 2013. Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 262 of 2014 challenging the communication.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968: Section 32
  • Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Dam...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Maharashtra Tenancy Act Case — Right to Purchase Not Lost Due to Lack of Knowledge of Landlord's Death. The court held that the limitation period under Section 32-F of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural...