Search Results for "contract killing"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Successive Bail Application in Contract Killing Case — No Change in Circumstances Found. Applicant accused of accepting money for contract murder under Section 302 IPC; earlier bail application withdrawn without liberty to file fresh application.

The applicant, Mohmad Sadik @ Guddu Malbari S/o Mohmad Siddik Lokhandwala, filed a successive regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Rejection of Bid for Suppression of Material Facts in Public Tender. Bidder's Failure to Disclose FIR and Charge Sheet for Bridge Collapse Constitutes Fraudulent Practice Under N.I.T. Clauses.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against a High Court judgment that had set aside the rejection of U.P. State B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Insufficient Material to Connect Accused with Murder Despite Financial Disputes and Recovery of Weapon.

The case arises from the murder of S.N. Gupta on 21.03.2006. The complainant, Kanta Devi, widow of the deceased, filed an FIR alleging that a man posi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Discharges Accused in Cheating Case — No Deception Where Complainant Knowingly Participated in Illegal Transaction. Ingredients of Section 420 IPC Not Made Out as Complainant Was Aware of the Illegal Purpose of Payment.

The petitioner, Mr. Ashok Haldankar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC challenging the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...