Search Results for "consumption otherwise"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "consumption otherwise"

696 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 696 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

22 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds BEST's Right to Recover Electricity Dues for Under-Recording Due to Loose Connections — Consumer Liable for Unrecorded Consumption Despite Absence of Malice. The court held that a consumer must pay for electricity actually consumed even if the meter under-recorded due to a technical defect, as the consumer had the benefit of the supply and the defect was not disputed.

4 Feb 2005

The case involves a dispute between the Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking) and Sharda Dyeing & Printing Works, a consumer of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case and Remands to NCDRC for Merits Decision. The Court held that deposit of surplus funds in a fixed deposit by a company does not automatically constitute commercial purpose under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, requiring examination of dominant intention, and allegations of fraud do not oust consumer forum jurisdiction if deficiency in service is alleged.

19 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment and order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 13.03.2023, which dismissed the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Excess Material Consumption Claim Upheld, Defective Work Claim Set Aside. Court Interprets Contractual Wastage Allowances and Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Excess Consumption Are Not Perverse, But Award for Defective Work Lacks Evidence.

2 Sep 2014

The petitioner, New Consolidated Construction Co. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 16th September 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Rules Petition Challenging Vires of Amending Act Not Rendered Infructuous Despite Subsequent Amendment; Restitution Claim Keeps Issue Alive. Court Examines Validity of Tax on Electricity Charges Under Karnataka Electricity (Taxation on Consumption) Act, 1959.

20 Jun 2025

(1) Background: The writ petitions were filed by several companies (textile mills, etc.) and the Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute, Interpreting Limitation Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the two-year limitation period under Section 56(2) bars recovery of additional charges from the date the sum first became due, based on billing error, and remanded the case for fresh consideration.

5 Oct 2021

The dispute arose when the appellant, a cotton yarn manufacturer in Panipat, Haryana, received a short assessment notice from the electricity distribu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes APMC Notices Requiring License for Poultry Feed Purchase — Food Grains for Personal Consumption Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under KAPMR Act, 1966. Purchase of food grains solely for feeding poultry is personal consumption, not trade, and does not require license under the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966.

6 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Lakshmi Poultry Complex and Kittur Chennamma Poultry Farm, are engaged in large-scale poultry farming, rearing around five lakh b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Sales Tax Exemption Case, Holding Assessment Order for Pre- and Post-Constitution Periods is Severable. Burden of Proof for Exemption Under Article 286(1)(a) Lies on Dealer, but Assessment Order Can Be Partly Declared Void Without Invalidating Entire Assessment.

1 Aug 1969

The appellant, a firm of dealers in pulses at Vijayawada, carried on business of sending pulses to other States by rail during the assessment year 194...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)