Search Results for "consumer protection rules 2020"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "consumer protection rules 2020"

181 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

14 Sep 2021

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-appointment of District Consumer Commission President After Unconstitutional Rules Struck Down — Petitioner Entitled to Consideration Under Pre-2020 Rules. The Court directed the State to consider the petitioner's application for re-appointment as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under the Model Rules, 2012, after the Rules of 2020 were declared unconstitutional.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Suhas Milind Untwale, was appointed as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Buldana on 06.02.2013. A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-Appointment of District Consumer Commission President Despite Tenure Expiry — Rules of 2020 Declared Unconstitutional, Petitioner Entitled to Consideration Under Pre-Existing Rules. The court directed the State to consider the petitioner's application for re-appointment under the Model Rules, 2012, as the Rules of 2020 were struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Suhas Milind Untwale, was appointed as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Buldana on 06.02.2013. U...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Forum's Order in Favor of Construction Worker in Welfare Scheme Dispute. Token Contribution Under BOCW Act Constitutes Consideration, Making Worker a 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

27 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated an appeal concerning whether a construction worker registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Class Action by Homebuyers Under Section 35(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Builder's Objection on Miniscule Percentage Rejected. Commonality of Interest Found in Delay in Possession and Unfair Trade Practices, Allowing Representative Complaint for All 1134 Apartment Purchasers.

17 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Brigade Enterprises Limited, a builder, against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case on Applicability of Deposit Condition Under Old Act. The court held that the appeal is governed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as the right of appeal accrued before the 2019 Act came into force, and the deposit of ₹50,000 under Section 23 suffices for entertaining the appeal.

15 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission directing the appellant to pay a substantial sum with interest. T...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against State Commission Order in Consumer Execution Proceedings — Compliance of Decree for Possession or Refund with Interest. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the execution applications for fresh adjudication, keeping all contentions open.

7 Aug 2025

The case involves an appeal by Kishore Bhardwaj, the complainant/decree holder, against a common order dated 11.09.2024 passed by the State Consumer D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

20 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)