Search Results for "consortium change"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Recall of Tender for Mine Operator Under Section 14 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999. Court Examines Whether Lowest Bidder Has Vested Right and Whether Conviction of Ex-Directors Justifies Cancellation.

The Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (the Corporation) issued a notice inviting tender on 02.12.2020 for the selection of a Mine Operator for the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to NLSIU's Separate Admission Test NLAT — Upholds University's Autonomy in Admission Process. NLSIU's decision to conduct its own entrance exam for 2020-21, deviating from CLAT, was held to be within its statutory powers under the NLSIU Act, 1986, and not arbitrary.

The judgment arises from a public interest writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla, father of a st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation in Contract Dispute. No Fraud or Special Equities Established to Prevent ONGC from Encashing Bank Guarantees Furnished by Mercator Oil & Gas.

The appellant, Mercator Oil & Gas Limited, had entered into a contract with the first respondent, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Ruling in Concession Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Consortium Members as They Were Not Signatories to the Concession Agreement.

The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, a major port constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, issued a glo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...