Search Results for "complainant hostile"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "complainant hostile"

1162 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1162 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Forest Officer in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proven by Credible Testimony and Recovery. The court held that the prosecution successfully proved the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, and the appellant's defence of planting was not credible.

1 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, a Forest Section Officer, challenging his conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.

15 Dec 2022

This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2020

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Jul 2019

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

27 Apr 2016

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

10 Feb 2016

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant Gopal Gadhave (accused no.1) was convicte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

25 Aug 2015

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

26 Apr 2012

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cheating in Promise-to-Marry Case — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Accused convicted under Section 417 IPC for inducing sexual intercourse on false promise of marriage, but acquitted of rape as consent was not vitiated.

20 Jul 2011

The appellant, Lahanu Waman Kharde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the offence punishable under Section 417 of the Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Medical evidence failed to corroborate alleged assault with axe and stick under Sections 326 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC.

1 Apr 2011

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 6.1.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Purna, in Regular Crim...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)