Search Results for "commuting accident"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Railway Claims Tribunal Rejection of Compensation for Untoward Incident. Held that strict proof of boarding train is not required under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989 and the claimant's version must be accepted unless rebutted by strong evidence.

The appellant, Nitin Navindas Hundiwala, a 75-year-old consultant, filed a claim for compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cruelty by Husband and Mother-in-Law in Dowry Harassment Case. Demand for Motorcycle and Payment of Debt Constitutes Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC.

The case pertains to the death of Pratibha, who was married to appellant No. 1 Datta Kamble on 09.03.1999. After about one month of marriage, she was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Compensation for Husband's Death Due to Wild Boar Attack Under Government Resolution Dated 11th July 2018. The court held that wild boar is a 'wild animal' under the resolution and the rejection was erroneous.

The petitioner, Anuja Arun Redij, is the widow of Shri Arun Arvind Redij, who died on 5th February 2019 due to injuries sustained when a wild boar att...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence Awarded for Triple Murder and Appeal Challenging Conviction. Convict Argues Prosecution Evidence Including Dying Declarations and Eyewitness Testimony is Unreliable and Seizure Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act is Invalid.

The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench heard a reference for confirmation of death sentence and an appeal filed by the convict Imdad Ali Waid Ali Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Insurance Company in Workmen's Compensation Case as Death of Employee While Commuting to Work Did Not Arise Out of Employment. Commuting Accident Lacking Causal Nexus with Employment Is Not Compensable Under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal arose from a judgment and award passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation in W.C.A. No. 28 of 2005, awarding compensation to th...