Search Results for "censure motion distinction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "censure motion distinction"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Service of Notice. Service of Notice on Son Not Valid Service Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

13 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talewadi, Taluka Atpadi, District Sangli. A motion of no confidence w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated against directors without specific averments of their role in the company's affairs.

28 Nov 2022

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) challenging a common order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Defamation Proceedings Against Insurance Company and Its Officers for Termination Letter Issued in Official Capacity. Letter of termination sent to employee by company held not to constitute defamation under Section 500 IPC as it was a privileged communication made in good faith and in the discharge of official duties.

28 Nov 2022

The applicants, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Limited and its officers, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Complaint Against Company Officials for Termination Letter Sent to Prospective Employer. Communication of termination to a prospective employer does not amount to publication to a third party under Section 500 IPC.

28 Nov 2022

The applicants, who were employees of Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Limited, challenged an order dated 30/11/2017 passed by the Judicia...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Convicts Advocate for Contempt of Court for Browbeating Judges and Making Baseless Allegations. The court held that the advocate's conduct of alleging that judges designate only relatives as Senior Advocates and making statements that lawyers are immune from contempt constitutes criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

12 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court of India, in a writ petition filed by the National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms and others, took suo motu ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

1 Mar 2019

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Diamond Bourse Suspension — Private Association's Internal Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. The court held that the Bharat Diamond Bourse, as a private company, had the right to regulate its membership and premises, and its actions were not amenable to writ jurisdiction or public law remedies.

16 Aug 2016

The plaintiffs, VSM Diamonds Pvt Ltd and three individuals, filed a suit against Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB), a company incorporated under Section 25 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Writ Petition and Sets Aside Additional Collector's Order Invalidating No-Confidence Motion Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Distinction Between No-Confidence Motion and Censure Motion Applied. No-Confidence Motion Need Not Set Out Grounds or Charges; Motion Passed by Seven Out of Eight Members Validly Held.

22 Nov 2013

The writ petition was filed by seven members of the Gram Panchayat of Kabansangvi, Ta. Chakur, District Latur, challenging an order of the Additional ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)