Search Results for "carry forward loss"

364 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 364 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Unexplained Investment in Silver Bullion. Section 69A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Applicable Where Assessee Fails to Explain Source of Acquisition of Silver Found in Possession.

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which allowed the appeals of the assessee, Prakash Chan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Loss Set-off Case. Loss from derivatives trading on recognized stock exchange held not speculative under Section 43(5)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961, and can be set off against other business income under Section 70.

The appellant, Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a domestic company deriving income from toll collection business and also trading in shares and d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Future Prospects Awardable in Permanent Disablement Cases. Loss of earning capacity must consider functional disability and actual income, not merely physical disability percentage.

The appellant, Pappu Deo Yadav, was a 20-year-old data entry operator earning ₹12,000 per month when he suffered a serious motor accident on 18.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's concurrent findings on non-concealment of income and non-furnishing of inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore,...