Search Results for "building permission refusal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "building permission refusal"

250 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 250 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project in Colaba, Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Defence Authority's Letter. NOC from Defence Authorities Not Required for Completion of Construction Under DCR 1991 as Height Restriction Under Works of Defence Act, 1903 Not Applicable to Building Height Below 30 Meters.

27 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment under the Development Control Regulations of 1991 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.

29 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FCRA Amendments in Challenge by NGOs — Restrictions on Foreign Contribution Transfers and Mandatory Account in SBI New Delhi Held Reasonable. Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sections 7, 12(1A), 12A, and 17(1) of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as Not Violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21.

8 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns the constitutional validity of amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) introduced by the Foreign Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

1 Jan 2021

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order in Deemed License Case — Failure to Decide Application Within Time Results in Deemed Grant Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Court held that the Corporation's inaction for over a year led to automatic grant of building license, and the demolition order without notice was illegal.

20 Dec 2021

The petitioner, a resident of Shimogga, owned a site and applied for a building license on 13.11.2020. The Corporation failed to decide the applicatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Cooperative Society Election — Procedural Irregularity in Returning Officer's Decision. Failure to Provide Reasons and Opportunity to Cure Defect Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Banganga Anurag Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)