Search Results for "bomb blast cases"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in UAPA Terror Case, Upholding NIA Investigation and Rejecting Torture Allegations. Court holds that stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA apply and that delay in raising torture claims without medical evidence is fatal.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Rajendra Chaudhary and Dhan Singh in Appeal No.107/2026, and Manohar Narwaria and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Delivers Common Judgment in Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in Murder Case Under Section 374(2) CrPC. Appeals Challenge Conviction by Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases Arising Out of Crime No.121 of 2002 for Murder of Venkatesan on 08.05.2002 at Thali.

These criminal appeals were filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the conviction and sentence imposed by the Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in 2012 Pune Bomb Blast Case Due to Long Pre-Trial Detention of Over 9 Years and Weak Evidence of Involvement. Prolonged detention without trial violates right to speedy trial under Article 21; bail granted under Section 21(4) of NIA Act.

The appellant, Munib Memon, was arrested in connection with the 2012 Pune bomb blast case (German Bakery blast) and had been in judicial custody for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Transfer Investigation in Govind Pansare Murder Case. Court finds no ground to transfer investigation from SIT to ATS as SIT is already conducting investigation.

The applicants, who are the daughter and daughter-in-law of deceased Comrade Govind Pansare, filed an interim application seeking transfer of further ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Pune Bomb Blasts Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Delay in Trial. Applicant Allegedly Supplied Firearms Not Used in Blasts; Court Relaxes Statutory Bar Under UAPA and MCOCA.

The applicant, Aslam Shabbir Sheikh @ Bunty Jagirdar, was arrested on 13th January 2013 in connection with C.R. No. 168 of 2012 (later re-registered a...