High Court of Judicature at Madras Delivers Common Judgment in Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in Murder Case Under Section 374(2) CrPC. Appeals Challenge Conviction by Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases Arising Out of Crime No.121 of 2002 for Murder of Venkatesan on 08.05.2002 at Thali.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

These criminal appeals were filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the conviction and sentence imposed by the Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases, Poonamallee, Chennai, on 26.03.2019. The conviction arose from the murder of one Venkatesan, which occurred on 08.05.2002 at about 9.00 a.m. at Thali. The case was registered as Crime No.121 of 2002 by the Thali Police Station, Krishnagiri District. After investigation, a charge sheet was filed against fifteen accused. Two accused, A14 and A15, were initially absconding; the case was split up. Trial proceeded against A1 to A13 in SC.No.4 of 2005. Later, A15 was secured and tried in the same case. A14 was subsequently secured and separately tried in SC.No.7 of 2007. Two judgments were delivered on 26.03.2019, convicting Krishnappa (A1), Narayanan @ Narayanappa (A3), Nagan @ Nagappa (A6), and Minor Kuross @ Venattasiri (A14). Aggrieved, the convicted accused preferred separate appeals: Crl.A.No.448 of 2019 by Minor Kuross @ Venkattagiri, Crl.A.No.512 of 2019 by Krishnappa and Narayanan @ Narayanappa, and Crl.A.No.928 of 2019 by Naga @ Nagappa. The appeals were heard together and reserved on 25.09.2024. The common judgment was pronounced on 19.02.2025. The judgment text provided only procedural background and did not include the court's analysis or final decision.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Appeal - Section 374(2) CrPC - The appeals arose from conviction for murder; the trial court convicted four accused - The High Court heard common appeals; outcome not specified (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court's conviction of the appellants for murder was justified under law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 29

Crl.A.Nos.448, 512 & 928 of 2019

2025-02-19

M.S. RAMESH, C.KUMARAPPAN

2025:MHC:444

Mr.P.Pugalenthi, Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, Mr.T.Naveen Chandar (for appellants); Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor (for respondent)

Minor Kuross @ Venkattagiri, Krishnappa, Narayanan @ Narayanappa, Naga @ Nagappa

State by The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai Circle, Thali Police Station, Krishnagiri District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against conviction for murder under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Remedy Sought

Set aside conviction and sentence dated 26.03.2019 and acquit the appellants.

Filing Reason

Appellants were convicted by the trial court in SC.No.4/2005 and SC.No.7/2007 for the murder of Venkatesan.

Previous Decisions

Trial court (Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases, Poonamallee, Chennai) convicted the appellants on 26.03.2019.

Issues

Whether the conviction and sentence imposed on 26.03.2019 in SC.No.4/2005 and SC.No.7/2007 were legally sustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

These appeals are arising against the murder of one Venkatesan, which took place on 08.05.2002 at about 9.00 a.m at Thali. After conclusion of two separate trials, two judgments were passed on 26.03.2019, convicting the present appellants qua A1 [Krishnappa], A3 [Narayanan @ Narayanappa], A6 [Nagan @ Nagappa] and A14 [Minor Kuross @ Venattasiri].

Procedural History

Charge sheet filed against 15 accused in PRC.No.24 of 2002. Accused A14 and A15 absconded; case split up. Trial proceeded against A1 to A13 in SC.No.4 of 2005. A15 later secured and tried. A14 separately tried in SC.No.7 of 2007. Both trials ended in conviction on 26.03.2019. Appeals filed under Section 374(2) CrPC. Heard and reserved on 25.09.2024. Common judgment pronounced on 19.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 374(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Occupancy Rights Claim. Failure to Consider Amendment Application and Provide Opportunity to Lead Evidence Renders Order Illegal.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Woman Panchayat Member in Encroachment Case — Lack of Evidence of Residence on Government Land. Collector's order set aside as spot inspection report failed to establish that petitioner resided on encro...