Search Results for "bipartite agreement"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court appoints sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from Share Subscription Agreement and Shareholders Agreement.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Developer's Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 11 Arbitration Application Over Tripartite Loan Agreements. Loan Agreement's Mumbai Seat Cannot Be Imported into Tripartite Agreements That Neither Specify Seat Nor Bind Developer to Mumbai Jurisdiction.

The dispute arose from two Tripartite Agreements dated November 2, 2016, executed among Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited as lender, M/s. Rise Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Shareholder Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Share Subscription and Shareholders' Agreement.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising out of disputes between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court appoints retired judge as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Master Service Agreement between parties.

The petitioner, Zanmai Labs Private Limited, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Societies in Section 9 Arbitration Petitions Against Federation and Developer. Termination of Bipartite MoU and Cancellation of MHADA Layout NOC Eroded Foundation of Tripartite Development Agreement, Meriting Interim Protection from Interference.

These were two commercial arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Borivali Shree Ganesh Nateshwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Reinstating Employee in Banking Company Case, Holding Voluntary Retirement Under Bipartite Settlement Valid. Employee's Inaction and Prolonged Absence After Sanctioned Leave Justified Deemed Voluntary Retirement Without Departmental Enquiry.

The dispute arose when an employee of State Bank of India, serving as a cashier cum clerk, availed leave and overstayed in Japan. Between April and Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Co-defendant in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Deletion of Party Ordered Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Co-defendant Against Whom No Relief Claimed is Not a Necessary Party.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a suit filed by Vidharbha Enterprises (plaintiff) against the Union of India and BSNL (...