Search Results for "bar council resolution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "bar council resolution"

356 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 356 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

27 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation and Rejection of Highest Bid in Municipal Contract for Construction of Shopping Complex. Court holds that the Municipal Council's decision to cancel the tender and reject the highest bid was arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, as the bidder was not given an opportunity to explain the alleged discrepancy in the bid document.

6 May 2022

The petitioner, Khilari Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of the Osmanabad Municipal Council (Respondent No. 5) to cancel the tender p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract in Municipal Tender Dispute — Unilateral Termination Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

27 Oct 2020

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., a partnership firm, was awarded a contract by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council for a projec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to NLSIU's Separate Admission Test NLAT — Upholds University's Autonomy in Admission Process. NLSIU's decision to conduct its own entrance exam for 2020-21, deviating from CLAT, was held to be within its statutory powers under the NLSIU Act, 1986, and not arbitrary.

11 Sep 2020

The judgment arises from a public interest writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla, father of a st...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.

8 Apr 2020

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Boycott of Courts by Lawyers for Demand of Bench at Pune/Kolhapur Constitutes Criminal Contempt. The Court ruled that abstention from court work and calls for boycott by Bar Associations to pressurize the government for establishment of a bench amounts to interference with the administration of justice and is criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

15 Sep 2017

The judgment arises from a suo moto criminal contempt petition initiated by the Bombay High Court and a connected writ petition filed by Manoj Oswal. ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging Facilitation Council's Jurisdiction Under MSMED Act — Arbitration Agreement Not Barred by Section 18 of MSMED Act. The court held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, being a special statute, overrides the arbitration agreement between the parties, and the Facilitation Council has jurisdiction to refer the dispute to arbitration.

31 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a Central Public Sector Enterprise, entered into agreements with respondent No. 2, M/s. People Infoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Bar Council Resolution Prohibiting Full-Time Salaried Law Officers from Practicing as Advocates. The Court Held That the Deletion of Exception Under Rule 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961 Is Valid and Applies to Municipal Law Officers.

17 Oct 2012

The case involves a challenge by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Principal Law Officer against resolutions of the Bar Council of I...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)