Search Results for "adhoc employee"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Ad Hoc Dental Surgeon Challenging Replacement by Bonded Candidate. MAT's finding that the Original Application became infructuous upon replacement of the ad hoc employee by a bonded candidate was upheld.

The petitioner, Dr. Anil Dhage, a qualified Dental Surgeon, was appointed on an ad hoc basis by the Dean of Medical College, Nagpur on 12.06.1998, fol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Pune Municipal Corporation in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Compulsory Retirement of Class IV Employee at Age 58 Instead of 60 Held Illegal Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Municipal Commissioner and Assistant Municipal Commissioner of Pune Municipal Corporation challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Removal of Bank Officer in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Documents and Enquiry Report, and Bias by Enquiry Officer Lead to Setting Aside of Removal Order Under Service Law.

The petitioner, Balaji Digambarrao Kotgire, was appointed as a Clerk-cum-Cashier in the Oriental Bank of Commerce on 7th July 1979. He was later promo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Petition Challenging Compassionate Appointment to Sons of Deceased Daily Wagers. Delay in Application Not Fatal When Policy Does Not Prescribe Limitation Period.

The petitioner, Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth, challenged the order of the Industrial Court which directed it to consider the applications of Nanasa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Safai Kamacharis' Petition Against Arbitrary Termination by Municipal Corporation. Contractual Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

The petitioners, nineteen individuals, were working as safai kamacharis (sanitation workers) on a contract basis with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal C...