Search Results for "acquisition proceedings void"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "acquisition proceedings void"

697 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 697 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Land Acquisition Award Void for Lack of Notice Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Purchase Notes Under Section 49 Do Not Bar Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that failure to issue mandatory notice under Section 4(1) renders the acquisition proceedings void ab initio, and purchase notes under Section 49 do not preclude acquisition.

16 Feb 2015

The petitioners, owners of land in Mouza Khutala, District Chandrapur, challenged the land acquisition award dated 15.03.2008 passed in Land Acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Inquiry Under Rule 4(2) of Goa, Daman and Diu Land Acquisition Rules, 1972. Failure to Hold Inquiry Under Rule 4(2) Before Issuing Sections 4 and 6 Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Acquisition Void.

16 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Agostinho Agnelo Sanches, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging two notifications dated 01.07.2009...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Holding Claim Under Section 24(2) of the New Act Not Established. The Court Found That Possession Taken and Compensation Deposited in 1998, Twin Conditions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Not Met.

5 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State for constructing government offices. Notification under Section 4(1) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project Due to Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Declaration Issued Beyond One-Year Statutory Period Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Rendering Acquisition Proceedings Null and Void.

11 Sep 2015

The petitioners, Baban Homaji Phadtare and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notification d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.

4 Mar 2025

The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Partition Deed Invalid for Want of Permission Under Section 86 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners' Claim of Prior Partition Fails as Mutation Entry Was Not Certified Due to Lack of Statutory Permission.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, three individuals, challenged the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special Land Acquisition Officer under the Land Acquisitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Double Acquisition of Land in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed as Land Already Acquired Once and Partitioned Thereafter. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4(1) — Double acquisition of same land not permissible.

21 Sep 2005

The petitioners, Devram Govind Gadge and Vitthal Govind Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Owners' Appeals and Quashes Land Acquisition Notification Due to Non-Implementation of Scheme Over 32 Years. Non-utilization of 88% of Acquired Land and 23-Year Delay in Compensation Deposit Render Acquisition Proceedings Void Under BDA Act.

28 Oct 2015

The land owners owned property in Sy.No.4 of Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a preliminar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Due to Non-Compliance with Section 28(1) of KIAD Act, 1966. Acquisition of Petitioners' Lands Held Void for Failure to Publish Preliminary Notification in Two Local Newspapers as Mandated by Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioners, owners of lands in question, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of thei...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance with Section 41(1) Proviso and Lapse of Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings. Acquisition Notification Held Invalid as Land Already Vested in State Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Was Not Available for Acquisition Under MHADA Act.

31 Jan 2012

The case involves a challenge to the acquisition of land bearing Survey No. 113/3 and 115/6 at Solapur under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Developm...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)