Search Results for "Writ jurisdiction Article 227"

3495 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3495 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 mandates that such petitions be heard by a Division Bench.

The Bombay High Court, in this judgment, addressed the procedural confusion regarding whether writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Refusal of Ex-Parte Injunction in Civil Suit, Citing Availability of Appeal Under CPC. Petitioner's Challenge to Trial Court Order Fails Due to Alternative Statutory Remedy

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 01.07.2022 by the Trial Court that refu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interlocutory Orders, Upholding Minimal Judicial Intervention in Arbitration. Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked to challenge procedural orders during ongoing arbitration proceedings.

The petitioner, M/s Space Wood Office Solution Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two interlo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Order as Not Maintainable. Remedy Lies Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Final Award.

The petitioner, Tirupati Shopping Centre Premises Co-op. Society Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...