Search Results for "Wankhede Stadium"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Cricket Association Election Dispute — Interim Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court holds that disputes relating to internal elections of a society are not maintainable in civil court without exhausting remedies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Gopinath Munde against the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) and its office bearers, includi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Cricket Association of Bihar Challenging BCCI Committee Report on Membership. Court holds that the report is not binding and the petitioner lacks locus standi to challenge it.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Wankhede Stadium to Mumbai Cricket Association. Court holds that lease of public property at nominal rent for promoting sports is not arbitrary and is a valid policy decision.

The petitioners, including Aam Aadmi Party and individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Franchisee in IPL Termination Dispute. Court restrains BCCI from terminating franchise agreement and issuing fresh tender pending arbitration, holding that prima facie case and balance of convenience favor the franchisee.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL), was the successful bidder for the Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Minor Cricketer's Petition Challenging Age Determination Test Report. The court quashed the TW-3 test report and directed BCCI and MCA to consider documentary evidence for age verification.

The petitioner, Master Sagar Prakash Chhabria, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Continuation of Status Quo Order Pending Hearing of Section 17 Application. Tribunal's Order Held to Be Interim Measure, Not Final Determination, and Within Its Jurisdiction Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), entered into a franchise agreement with the respondent, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BCCI's Five-Year Ban on Cricketer for Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Proceedings Set Aside as Petitioner Denied Fair Hearing and Cross-Examination Rights Under BCCI Anti-Corruption Code.

The petitioner, Hiken Naresh Shah, a professional cricketer who had played 37 first-class matches, challenged the order of the Board of Control for Cr...