Search Results for "Unjustifiable delay"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Condone 1503-Day Delay in Restoration of Suit — Lack of Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay. Condonation of Delay Denied as Plaintiff Failed to Explain Delay of Over Four Years in Seeking Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Want of Prosecution.

The plaintiff, Metal Rolling Works Ltd., filed an interim application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of a 1503-day d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Personal Hearing Notice Due to Inordinate Delay in Adjudication — Customs Act, 1962 — Delay of 16 Years in Remand Proceedings Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Right to Speedy Adjudication

The petitioners, M/s. Esjaypee Impex Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, challenged a show cause notice dated 24.09.2003 and a personal hearing notic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 1590 days in filing appeal against enhanced compensation not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves Civil Applications filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers (applicants) seeking condonation of a 1590-day delay in instit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Charge Sheet and Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 16 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Departmental inquiry for misconduct committed in 1996 initiated in 2013 held to be unjust, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Prabhatsinh Amarsinh Makwana, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Employee Seeking Retrospective Promotion Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Withdrawal of Promotion in 2002 Not Challenged Promptly; Repeated Representations Found Insufficient to Condone Laches Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Debi Prasad Satapathy, approached the High Court of Bombay seeking a writ to direct the respondents, Union of India and Airports Autho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Duty Demand Case Due to Inordinate Delay — 9-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Is Oppressive Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Eastern Agencies Aromatics (P) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition challenging a Show Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Act Case Due to Inordinate and Unexplained Delay of 15 Years. Transfer to Call Book Without Intimation Violates Section 28(9) of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Paresh H. Mehta, a sole proprietor of M/s. P. H. Mehta and Co., challenged a show cause notice dated 16 May 2008 issued under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Council's Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing Second Appeal Against Eviction Decree. Delay of 3 Years and 7 Months Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing Due to Administrative Lapses and Change of Officers.

The Nandurbar Municipal Council, through its Chief Officer, filed two civil applications (CA/14019/2010 and CA/14020/2010) in the Bombay High Court at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Imposition of Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act. Penalty under Section 4(A)(3)(b) cannot be imposed without pleading and evidence of unjustifiable delay.

The petitioners, Umarkha Samsherkha and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Benc...