Search Results for "ULCR Act 1976"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ in ULCR Act Land Possession Dispute; Civil Court Jurisdiction to Determine Factual Possession Holds, Not Ousted by Section 33(3) of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976

The writ petition arose from proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976, concerning surplus vacant land in Mumbai. The petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Land Executed in 1975, Suit Filed in 1985, Dismissed as Time-Barred and for Failure to Prove Continuous Readiness.

The respondent no.1/plaintiff, a cooperative housing society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of land dated 30.1.1975, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Development Not Concluded Due to Missing Essential Terms. Failure to Prove Concluded Contract for Sale of Land as Agreement Lacked Certainty of Terms and Was Subject to Further Negotiations.

The appellant, Ramesh Amarnath Malhotra, a builder and developer trading as Deonar Development Corporation, filed a suit for specific performance of a...