Search Results for "Tribal reservation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Tribal reservation"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Housing Allotment Case Over Scheduled Tribe Reservation. The Court upheld the lower courts' decrees, ruling that reservation benefits under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India are confined to the State or Union Territory of origin, and migrants cannot claim such benefits in another jurisdiction without a corresponding Presidential Order.

7 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from an advertisement dated 28.06.1983 by the Chandigarh Housing Board, calling for applications for allotment of houses with reserv...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Considers Challenge to LPG Distributorship Advertisement and Unified Guidelines for Selection in PESA Areas. The Court Examined Whether Petroleum Corporations Were Bound to Reserve LPG Distributorships for Scheduled Tribes Under Section 4(m)(iv) of PESA Act and Noted That Selected Candidates in Certain Open Category Locations Were Members of Scheduled Tribes.

3 Sep 2021

The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an advertisement dated 31.08.2017 and Unified...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Migrant Students Claiming Reservation as Scheduled Tribes in Maharashtra, Upholding State's Denial of Benefits. A Full Bench holds that entitlement to reservation is state-specific and requires ordinary residence in the relevant locality at the time of Presidential Notification under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India.

3 Mar 2010

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, upon a reference by a Division Bench, constituted a Full Bench to resolve a conflict in decisions regarding th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Migrant from Gujarat. Dhodia Tribe Recognized in Both States; Migration Does Not Disentitle Benefits in Maharashtra.

23 Nov 2005

The Petitioner, Bankimchandra Makanbhai Patel, claimed to belong to the Dhodia tribe, which is recognized as a Scheduled Tribe under Article 342(1) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tribal Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal of Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions for Sale of Tribal Land.

20 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, owned land in Valshind, Thane. He sought to sell the land to respondent No. 6, a non-tri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds 100% Reservation for Local Scheduled Tribes in Teacher Posts in Scheduled Areas of Andhra Pradesh. Memos extending reservation to promotions and giving retrospective effect from 1986 held valid as explanatory and consequential.

19 May 2023

The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms. No.3 dated 10.01.2000 providing for 100% reservation in favour of local scheduled tribe candidates for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe Claims by Scrutiny Committee Citing Lack of Tribal Roots and Negative Affinity Test. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Claims Rejected as Petitioners Failed to Establish Anthropological Linkage and Migration from Tribal Areas Despite Prior Validity Certificates to Siblings.

4 May 2018

The petitioners, Monika and Chetan (sister and brother), filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the orders o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.

19 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Maharashtra Tribal Reservation Notifications and Government Resolutions. Petitioners Alleged Violation of Articles 14 to 16 of Constitution by Notification Dated 29 August 2019 and Government Resolutions Dated 1 February 2023 and 28 February 2023.

27 Sep 2023

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized of a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Maharashtra Government Notif...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Admission of ST Student Despite Pending Validity Certificate, Emphasizing Right to Education. Court directs provisional admission based on father's valid tribe certificate and pending scrutiny application.

8 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Kedar Nandkishor Pawar, an 18-year-old student belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High C...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)